The way you have all of the squares laid out makes me think of M.C. Escher. It's really cool! I think you should attach them like a square because it gives it a continuous flow. If they were linear, I think it wouldn't be as exciting.
If you feel ambitious enough, I think it would be cool to see this with more of these squares. It would make it a cool optical illusion that people could get lost in. Almost like a giant leather quilt that takes up an entire wall. You like taking up wall space, right?
I like the abstract shapes –keep it up because it’s awesome! Do you see this possibly leading to a new series?
I'm thinking of laying them flat on thin masonite and using a black metal thin line frame like the ones used in photography or...
I could wrap them around a 1" thick stretcher bar which will make the composition smaller 1 1/2" on each side. (overall by about 3") but it gives the work more dimension.
The way you have all of the squares laid out makes me think of M.C. Escher. It's really cool! I think you should attach them like a square because it gives it a continuous flow. If they were linear, I think it wouldn't be as exciting.
ReplyDeleteIf you feel ambitious enough, I think it would be cool to see this with more of these squares. It would make it a cool optical illusion that people could get lost in. Almost like a giant leather quilt that takes up an entire wall. You like taking up wall space, right?
I like the abstract shapes –keep it up because it’s awesome! Do you see this possibly leading to a new series?
How are you going to frame these, Phil??
ReplyDeleteI'm still debating.
ReplyDeleteI'm thinking of laying them flat on thin masonite and using a black metal thin line frame like the ones used in photography or...
I could wrap them around a 1" thick stretcher bar which will make the composition smaller 1 1/2" on each side. (overall by about 3") but it gives the work more dimension.
that is definitely a tough call..
ReplyDeletei think i kinda like the idea of a thicker frame...
but..
i'm not sure x.x